some dangerous tour shows was filmed in 16 or 35 mm, im pretty sure about 16mm due the size of the camera, like bangkok 93 and madrid 92
I made a post and put on screencaptures of 35mm and 16mm in some concerts of dangerous tour like Argentina and Mexico.
I’ll actually take that. 93 was the only one I don’t have much info on. Didn’t actually think there was any info.
just the Argentina concert which idk if we know what it was filmed with cause that was done through a 3rd party.
what Michael gave to his driver (what we have) to my recollection was just a rough cut, final rough cut for approval or whatever which would make sense to be on vhs.
Mexico, I knew it was intended for release, later scrapped as well and we got those 4 songs from it in the broadcast.
as I said, I don’t know much to do with 93 but Argentina was definitely shot through a third party and correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t Mexico as well?
If that is the case then we can’t really use at least those 93 shows as an example cause with putting two and two together with Michaels mental state and drug issue and the fact that the Argentina show was basically completely the 3rd party’s control cause it sounded as if Michael just wanted to check the final product which was COMPLETELY wrong in every aspect...
I couldn’t think Michael would have had much to do with it because solely how different the shooting and audio stuff is. In other words seemed like they weren’t given guidance of what to do.
I’d also assume with that that the cameras and basically everything shooting the show and audio was their ideas and decisions.
Just some food for thought.
Not discounting or discrediting 93 though.
for 92 in Madrid, can you show me stuff which shows it is shot in 16mm?
Genuinely would love to see and am intrigued